 |
Ontology matching
is a key interoperability enabler for the Semantic Web, as well as a useful technique in
some classical data integration tasks dealing with the semantic heterogeneity problem. It takes ontologies
as input and determines as output an alignment, that is, a set of correspondences between the
semantically related entities of those ontologies. These correspondences can be used for various tasks,
such as ontology merging, data interlinking, query answering or process mapping. Thus, matching
ontologies enables the knowledge and data expressed with the matched ontologies to interoperate.
The workshop has three goals:
-
To bring together leaders from academia, industry and user institutions to assess how academic
advances are addressing real-world requirements. The workshop will strive to improve academic
awareness of industrial and final user needs, and therefore, direct research towards those needs.
Simultaneously, the workshop will serve to inform industry and user representatives about existing
research efforts that may meet their requirements. The workshop will also investigate how the
ontology matching technology is going to evolve, especially with respect to data interlinking, process
mapping and web table matching tasks.
-
To conduct an extensive and rigorous evaluation of ontology matching and instance matching
(link discovery) approaches through the
OAEI
(Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative)
2019 campaign.
Besides real-world specific matching tasks, such as the disease-phenotype track supported
by the Pistoia Alliance, will introduce the
Semantic Web Challenge on Tabular Data to Knowledge Graph Matching
track, supported by IBM Research.
-
To examine similarities and differences from other, old, new and emerging, techniques and usages, such as process matching, web table matching or knowledge embeddings.
|
|
|
|
 |
Audience:
The workshop encourages participation from academia, industry and user institutions with the emphasis on
theoretical and practical aspects of ontology matching. On the one side, we expect representatives from
industry and user organizations to present business cases and their requirements for ontology matching.
On the other side, we expect academic participants to present their approaches vis-a-vis those
requirements. The workshop provides an informal setting for researchers and practitioners from different
related initiatives to meet and benefit from each other's work and requirements.
This year, in sync with the main conference, we encourage submissions specifically devoted to:
(i) datasets, benchmarks and replication studies, services, software, methodologies, protocols and measures (not necessarily related to OAEI),
and (ii) application of the matching technology in real-life scenarios and assessment of its usefulness to the final users.
Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
- Business and use cases for matching (e.g., big, open, closed data);
- Requirements to matching from specific application scenarios (e.g., public sector, homeland security);
- Application of matching techniques in real-world scenarios (e.g., with environmental data);
- Formal foundations and frameworks for matching;
- Matching and knowledge graphs;
- Matching and deep learning;
- Matching and embeddings;
- Matching and big data;
- Matching and linked data;
- Instance matching, data interlinking and relations between them;
- Privacy-aware matching;
- Process model matching;
- Large-scale and efficient matching techniques;
- Matcher selection, combination and tuning;
- User involvement (including both technical and organizational aspects);
- Explanations in matching;
- Social and collaborative matching;
- Uncertainty in matching;
- Reasoning with alignments;
- Alignment coherence and debugging;
- Alignment management;
- Matching for traditional applications (e.g., data science);
- Matching for emerging applications (e.g., web tables, knowledge graphs).
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to the workshop can be made in terms of technical papers and posters/statements of interest addressing
different issues of ontology matching as well as participating in the OAEI 2019 campaign.
Long technical papers should be of max. 12 pages.
Short technical papers should be of max. 5 pages.
Posters/statements of interest should not exceed 2 pages.
All contributions have to be prepared using the
LNCS Style
and should be submitted in PDF format
(no later than June 28th, 2019)
through the workshop submission site at:
https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=om2019
Contributors to the
OAEI 2019 campaign
have to follow the campaign conditions and schedule at
http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2019/.
Important dates:
Contributions will be refereed by the
Program Committee.
Accepted papers will be published in the workshop proceedings as a volume of
CEUR-WS
as well as indexed on DBLP.
By submitting a paper, the authors accept the CEUR-WS and DBLP publishing rules.
In order for the paper to appear in the workshop proceedings, one of the
authors must register for both the conference and the workshop
by the EARLY registration deadline.
|
|
|
|
 |
Long Technical Papers:
Audun Vennesland, Richard M. Keller, Christoph G. Schuetz, Eduard Gringinger, Bernd Neumayr
Multi-view embedding for biomedical ontology matching
Weizhuo Li, Xuxiang Duan, Meng Wang, XiaoPing Zhang, Guilin Qi
Identifying mappings among knowledge graphs by formal concept analysis
Guowei Chen, Songmao Zhang
Short Technical Papers:
OAEI Papers:
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2019
Alsayed Algergawy,
Daniel Faria,
Alfio Ferrara,
Irini Fundulaki,
Ian Harrow,
Sven Hertling,
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz,
Naouel Karam,
Abderrahmane Khiat,
Patrick Lambrix,
Huanyu Li,
Stefano Montanelli,
Heiko Paulheim,
Catia Pesquita,
Tzanina Saveta,
Pavel Shvaiko,
Andrea Splendiani,
Elodie Thiéblin,
Cássia Trojahn,
Jana Vataščinová,
Ondřej Zamazal,
Lu Zhou
-
AnyGraphMatcher submission to the OAEI knowledge graph challenge 2019
Alexander Lütke
-
ALIN results for OAEI 2019
Jomar da Silva, Carla Delgado, Kate Revoredo, Fernanda Baião
-
AML and AMLC results for OAEI 2019
Daniel Faria, Catia Pesquita, Teemu Tervo, Francisco M. Couto, Isabel F. Cruz
-
AROA results for 2019 OAEI
Lu Zhou, Michelle Cheatham, Pascal Hitzler
-
CANARD complex matching system: results of the 2019 OAEI evaluation campaign
Elodie Thiéblin, Ollivier Haemmerlé, Cássia Trojahn
-
DOME results for OAEI 2019
Sven Hertling, Heiko Paulheim
-
EVOCROS: results for OAEI 2019
Juliana Medeiros Destro, Javier A. Vargas, Julio Cesar dos Reis, Ricardo da S. Torres
-
FCAMap-KG results for OAEI 2019
Fei Chang, Guowei Chen, Songmao Zhang
-
FTRLIM results for OAEI 2019
Xiaowen Wang, Yizhi Jiang, Yi Luo, Hongfei Fan, Hua Jiang, Hongming Zhu, Qin Liu
-
Lily results for OAEI 2019
Jiangheng Wu, Zhe Pan, Ce Zhang, Peng Wang
-
LogMap family participation in the OAEI 2019
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
-
ONTMAT1: results for OAEI 2019
Saida Gherbi, Mohamed Tarek Khadir
-
POMap++ results for OAEI 2019: fully automated machine learning approach for ontology matching
Amir Laadhar, Faiza Ghozzi, Imen Megdiche, Franck Ravat, Olivier Teste, Faiez Gargouri
-
SANOM results for OAEI 2019
Majid Mohammadi, Amir Ahooye Atashin, Wout Hofman, Yao-Hua Tan
-
Wiktionary matcher
Jan Portisch, Michael Hladik, Heiko Paulheim
Posters:
-
MultiKE: a multi-view knowledge graph embedding framework for entity alignment
Wei Hu, Qingheng Zhang, Zequn Sun, Jiacheng Huang
-
MTab: matching tabular data to knowledge graph with probability models
Phuc Nguyen, Natthawut Kertkeidkachorn, Ryutaro Ichise, Hideaki Takeda
-
Generating referring expressions from knowledge graphs
Armita Khajeh Nassiri, Nathalie Pernelle, Fatiha Saïs
-
Semantic table interpretation using MantisTable
Marco Cremaschi, Anisa Rula, Alessandra Siano, Flavio De Paoli
-
Towards explainable entity matching via comparison queries
Alina Petrova, Egor V. Kostylev, Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Ian Horrocks
-
Discovering expressive rules for complex ontology matching and data interlinking
Manuel Atencia, Jérôme David, Jérôme Euzenat, Liliana Ibanescu, Nathalie Pernelle, Fatiha Saïs, Élodie Thiéblin, Cássia Trojahn
-
Decentralized reasoning on a network of aligned ontologies with link keys
Jérémy Lhez, Chan Le Duc, Thinh Dong, Myriam Lamolle
Associated ISWC challenge posters:
-
Entity linking to knowledge graphs to infer column types and properties
Avijit Thawani, Minda Hu, Erdong Hu, Husain Zafar, Naren Teja Divvala, Amandeep Singh, Ehsan Qasemi, Pedro Szekely, Jay Pujara
-
ISWC challenge: transforming tabular data into semantic knowledge
Gilles Vandewiele, Bram Steenwinckel, Filip De Turck, Femke Ongenae
-
DAGOBAH: an end-to-end context-free tabular data semantic annotation system
Yoan Chabot, Thomas Labbe, Jixiong Liu and Raphaël Troncy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule |
8:30-9:20 |
Poster set-up
(Foyer 260)
|
9:20-9:30 |
Welcome and workshop overview
(Case Room 1 - 260 005)
Organizers |
9:30-10:30 |
Paper presentation session: Methods and Applications - I |
9:30-9:50 |
Matching ontologies for air traffic management: a comparison and reference alignment of the AIRM and NASA ATM ontologies
Audun Vennesland, Richard M. Keller, Christoph G. Schuetz, Eduard Gringinger, Bernd Neumayr |
9:50-10:10 |
Multi-view embedding for biomedical ontology matching
Weizhuo Li, Xuxiang Duan, Meng Wang, XiaoPing Zhang, Guilin Qi |
10:10-10:30 |
Identifying mappings among knowledge graphs by formal concept analysis
Guowei Chen, Songmao Zhang |
10:30-11:30 |
Coffee break / Poster session
(Foyer 260)
|
11:30-12:00 |
Paper presentation session: Methods and Applications - II |
11:30-11:45 |
Hypernym relation extraction for establishing subsumptions: preliminary results on matching foundational ontologies
Mouna Kamel, Daniela Schmidt, Cássia Trojahn, Renata Vieira |
11:45-12:00 |
Generating corrupted data sources for the evaluation of matching systems
Fiona McNeill, Diana Bental, Alasdair Gray, Sabina Jedrzejczyk, Ahmad Alsadeeqi |
12:00-12:45 |
Paper presentation session: OAEI-2019 campaign |
12:00-12:45 |
Introduction to the OAEI 2019 campaign
Organizers |
12:45-14:00 |
Lunch
(OGGB Foyer) |
14:00-15:00 |
Keynote address
by
Juan Sequeda
(data.world)
|
15:00-16:00 |
Coffee break / Poster session
(Foyer 260)
|
16:00-16:45 |
Paper presentation session: OAEI-2019 campaign (cont'd) |
16:00-16:15 |
Using LogMap in real-world applications
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz |
16:15-16:30 |
Entity linking to knowledge graphs to infer column types and properties (Tabularisi)
Avijit Thawani, Minda Hu, Erdong Hu, Husain Zafar, Naren Teja Divvala, Amandeep Singh, Ehsan Qasemi, Pedro Szekely, Jay Pujara |
16:30-16:45 |
ISWC challenge: transforming tabular data into semantic knowledge
Gilles Vandewiele, Bram Steenwinckel, Filip De Turck, Femke Ongenae |
16:45-17:20 |
Discussion and wrap-up |
|
|
|
Details on the keynote address by Juan Sequeda (data.world)
|
|
Title: The socio-technical phenomena of data integration
Abstract: Data Integration has been an active area of computer science research for over two decades.
A modern manifestations is as Knowledge Graphs which integrates not just data but also knowledge at scale.
Tasks such as Domain modeling and Schema/Ontology Matching are fundamental in the data integration process.
Research focus has been on studying the data integration phenomena from a technical point of view (algorithms and systems) with the ultimate goal of automating this task.
In the process of applying scientific results to real world enterprise data integration scenarios to design and build Knowledge Graphs,
we have experienced numerous obstacles. In this talk, I will share insights about these obstacles.
I will argue that we need to think outside of a technical box and further study the phenomena of data integration with a human-centric lens:
from a socio-technical point of view.
|
|
|
|
|
Organizing Committee:
Trentino Digitale,
Italy
E-mail: pavel [dot] shvaiko [at] tndigit [dot] it
Jérôme Euzenat
INRIA & Univ. Grenoble Alpes, France
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
City, University of London, UK & SIRIUS, University of Oslo, Norway
Oktie Hassanzadeh
IBM Research, USA
Cássia Trojahn
IRIT, France
Program Committee:
- Alsayed Algergawy,
Jena University, Germany
- Manuel Atencia,
INRIA & Univ. Grenoble Alpes, France
- Zohra Bellahsene,
LIRMM, France
- Jiaoyan Chen,
University of Oxford, UK
- Valerie Cross,
Miami University, USA
- Jérôme David,
University Grenoble Alpes & INRIA, France
- Gayo Diallo,
University of Bordeaux, France
- Warith Eddine Djeddi,
LIPAH & LABGED, Tunisia
- AnHai Doan,
University of Wisconsin, USA
- Alfio Ferrara,
University of Milan, Italy
- Marko Gulić,
University of Rijeka, Croatia
- Wei Hu,
Nanjing University, China
- Ryutaro Ichise,
National Institute of Informatics, Japan
- Antoine Isaac,
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam & Europeana, Netherlands
- Marouen Kachroudi,
Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunis
- Simon Kocbek,
University of Melbourne, Australia
- Prodromos Kolyvakis,
EPFL, Switzerland
- Patrick Lambrix,
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
- Oliver Lehmberg,
University of Mannheim, Germany
- Vincenzo Maltese,
University of Trento, Italy
- Fiona McNeill,
University of Edinburgh, UK
- Christian Meilicke,
University of Mannheim, Germany
- Peter Mork,
MITRE, USA
- Andriy Nikolov,
Metaphacts GmbH, Germany
- Axel Ngonga,
University of Paderborn, Germany
- George Papadakis,
University of Athens, Greece
- Catia Pesquita,
University of Lisbon, Portugal
- Henry Rosales-Méndez,
University of Chile, Chile
- Juan Sequeda,
data.world, USA
- Kavitha Srinivas,
IBM, USA
- Giorgos Stoilos,
National Technical University of Athens, Greece
- Pedro Szekely,
University of Southern California, USA
- Valentina Tamma,
University of Liverpool, UK
- Ludger van Elst,
DFKI, Germany
- Xingsi Xue,
Fujian University of Technology, China
- Ondřej Zamazal,
Prague University of Economics, Czech Republic
- Songmao Zhang,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Acknowledgements:
We appreciate support from the
Trentino as a Lab
initiative of the
European Network of the Living Labs
at
Trentino Digitale,
the EU
SEALS
project, as well as
the Pistoia Alliance Ontologies Mapping
project and
IBM Research.
|
|
|
|